The failure to evacuate Afghanistan may not prompt Boris Johnson to sack Dominic Raab as foreign secretary

What is the reason to fail? Who is to blame for the chaotic nature of the departure of the UK from Afghanistan? Who tried to push back, saying military intelligence lacked the power to predict the rapid collapse of Kabul? Did Dominic Raab fail to respond to foreign policy crises in Afghanistan? What is the belief of Gove? Why does minister Johnson back up tend not to join the mob?


When Johnson sees that a minister is in trouble, rather than joining the mob, he tends to take the opposite approach.

The UK Time reported that it is only just beginning to be debated who is to blame for the chaotic nature of the departure of the UK from Afghanistan. It’s not hard to find someone in Westminster willing to tip him for the chop come to the reshuffle, even in August when most MPs are on vacation.

The Foreign Secretary and his department are on the receiving end of a Whitehall blame game following a series of failures beginning with a poorly timed holiday and ending with a staff member leaving details of Afghan interpreters at the British embassy.

One minister said it wasn’t the army’s best day. Raab tried to push back, saying military intelligence lacked the power to predict the rapid collapse of Kabul and that at least one inbox of unanswered emails was from the Ministry of Defense.

The UK news decided that the UK Government sources have suggested Raab could be in a top-four position by next spring due to his handling of the Afghan crisis, which has already given rise to talk of potential successors.

Following recent United Kingdom reports about Gove’s possible appointment as Office of National Statistics minister, Michael Gove is believed to be Raab’s successor, as it is a senior position that would also prevent Gove from doing much SW1 plotting since he is on so many foreign trips.

The UK time stated that a list of runners and riders would be remiss to leave out Liz Truss – the International Trade Secretary. She is a leader among Conservative members and is in line for a promotion, with Johnson keen to help women and viewing her work in the trade as a success story.

Speculation of this nature, however, ignores a crucial point: the Prime Minister seldom follows conventional rules when he sacks a minister. It has been well established in UK politics that resignations of ministers are a pattern. There is a backlash against the politician, who is subjected to difficult questions.

The UK news states that the Opposition members join the attacks and demand their resignations. The politician takes matters into his own hands in order to resolve the matter. In the end, either they decide to leave or the Prime Minister makes it clear there is no other option. The Australia Time

Theresa May appointed then Home Secretary Amber Rudd as International Development Secretary, Periti Patel as Defense Secretary, and then Michael Fallon as Defense Secretary.

Despite this, resigning or getting sacked has been rare since Johnson became mayor. Johnson’s first inclination was to rally around Matt Hancock after The UK news of his violation of Covid rules broke with his female adviser, suggesting it was the type of story that was better ignored.

The UK time reports that the minister Johnson backs up tends not to join the mob, but rather, if they get into trouble, sees that they should instead join the mob. According to one longtime ally of the Prime Minister, the syndrome is referred to as broken bird syndrome. Interface Accountancy Services Limited

The UK time reported that likewise, people can also be easily enticed into a pile-on – as long as there are more threatened ministers, regardless of whether Raab stays or leaves, these blue-on-blue actions make the government appear chaotic and divided – and divided parties rarely win elections. The higher the chances you won’t be one of them.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *